View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
boyzo Intermediate Contributor 25+
Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2006 1:22 am Post subject: Linn = dreadffull |
|
|
Linn products are simply dreadfull
Ivor T stole the concept of the LP12 from Ed Villchur of AR fame and Eds wonderfull turntable.
the LP12 is awfull it struggles to get the platter up to speed with the puny smiths clock motor, the build of the LP12 is dreadfull.
Linn's speakers too are dreadfull his Isobarik is an absolute sham. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ColinR Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 31 Jul 2004 Posts: 1175 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nudge, nudge, want to see some Electron Micrographs of the bearing of my unused Linn Sondek chassis, bought from Technical and General for £55 in the dim and distant .
The machining on my "mass produced" Thorens TD-321's is far superior btw .
http://www.theanalogdept.com/colin_royle.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Parts Senior Contributor 100+
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 181 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 10:15 pm Post subject: Linn speakers |
|
|
I personaly find Linn speakers fun, they are particulary well sealed, and I prefer the Linn Kans and Isobariks to the rest of their products.
I think the turntable is not that bad, The end results which should be judged are sound quality and entertainment , and in a lot of peoples ears the LP12 was judged best , allbeit at the expence of constant retuning and of course the press helped a bit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 12:09 am Post subject: Re: Linn speakers |
|
|
THREE! TD-321s?! That is just plain greedy... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
boyzo Intermediate Contributor 25+
Joined: 10 May 2003 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
ColinR wrote: | Nudge, nudge, want to see some Electron Micrographs of the bearing of my unused Linn Sondek chassis, bought from Technical and General for £55 in the dim and distant .
The machining on my "mass produced" Thorens TD-321's is far superior btw .
Not surprised
A turntable spindle needs to hardened and ground between centres if your Thorens is better it surprises me little
http://www.theanalogdept.com/colin_royle.htm |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
proffski Über Contributor 1000+
Joined: 22 Aug 2003 Posts: 1297 Location: Tewkesbury UK
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the AR was that good then it would have built up a following like the Thorens... I so miss mine... Only fell in love with moving coil cartridges then. The Shure V15MK-whatever is somewhere in the attic with the rest of the museum. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stuart Booth Junior Contributor 20+
Joined: 14 Jan 2006 Posts: 24 Location: Manchester UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:02 pm Post subject: The AR EB101 Enigma |
|
|
Please sit down - NOW!!!
In the 80's I swapped a (too bl**dy big!) TD125, 3009(2) V15(11) SME2000 plinth, for an EB101 (No wonder the dealer didn't want any money to swap.)
Having said that, and having had that one stolen some years ago, I have just bought another one. True, the platter could do with being heavier and the suspension is very flimsy and the woodwork is cheap, but coupled with the LVX look alike arm - the damned thing works. It tracks a Denon DL103 at 2.6 gms beautifully and the sound is fast, smooth and delights, whereas my TD160 with TP16 arm is too stuffy and the music sounds very heavy and proper with an over emphasised bottom. The AR also gives me no surface noise.
So, there you go, it takes all sorts. Just adds to the theory of 'Mix & Match' or what suits one amp/speaker/room/music/ears combination, might not suit another. _________________ Stu. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|